Minnesota Senate Passes Sweepstakes Casino Ban Bill
The Minnesota Senate passed SF 4474, a bill banning dual-currency sweepstakes casinos, by a 62-3 vote. A companion bill banning prediction markets, SF 4511, passed 56-10. Both now head to the House ahead of the May 18 deadline. If enacted, the laws would impose criminal penalties and could affect payment processors, geolocation providers, and affiliates serving affected platforms.
Editorial Summary
The Minnesota Senate passed SF 4474, a bill banning dual-currency sweepstakes casinos, by a 62-3 vote. A companion bill banning prediction markets, SF 4511, passed 56-10. Both now head to the House ahead of the May 18 deadline. If enacted, the laws would impose criminal penalties and could affect payment processors, geolocation providers, and affiliates serving affected platforms.
Reporting Notes
Confirmed Facts
This article does not have source-mapped fact notes yet. Use the source list below before relying on material claims.
Interpretation & Caveats
- Any forward-looking impact or player takeaway is editorial interpretation unless directly attributed to a source.
- This is general information, not legal advice. Operator terms, eligibility rules, and responsible gaming resources should be checked before playing.
See an error? Send a correction.
Reader Checklist
- Separate confirmed facts from market reaction or opinion.
- Check dates, source links, and operator terms before acting on a news update.
- Use related reviews or state pages to see whether the change affects your situation.
- Treat legal or regulatory stories as context, not personal legal advice.
Evidence & Source Notes

Key Takeaways
- SF 4474 passed the Minnesota Senate 62-3, banning dual-currency [sweepstakes casinos](/sweepstakes-casinos)
- SF 4511 passed 56-10, banning [prediction markets](/prediction-markets) on sports and elections
- Both bills now await House action before the May 18 legislative deadline
- Attorney General Keith Ellison previously sent cease-and-desist orders to 14 sweepstakes platforms
Minnesota Senate votes to ban dual-currency sweepstakes
The Minnesota Senate passed SF 4474 on May 5, 2026, with a 62-3 vote, targeting dual-currency sweepstakes casinos. The bill defines such platforms as those offering both free play currency and redeemable sweepstakes coins, a model used by most major U.S. sweepstakes casinos. Operators like Fortune Coins and LuckyLand Slots had already received cease-and-desist letters from Attorney General Keith Ellison's office in 2025.
Senator John Marty, a co-sponsor, said in the floor debate:
"Prediction markets are nothing more than gambling, but they have found loopholes to circumvent our laws."
SF 4474 explicitly includes payment processors, financial firms, geolocation service providers, and marketing affiliates as potentially liable parties. The bill also attaches criminal penalties for operators who continue to accept Minnesota players.
Prediction markets also in the crosshairs
The Senate also passed SF 4511 with a 56-10 vote, extending the ban to prediction markets covering sports, elections, and other event outcomes. Senator Matt Klein co-sponsored the bill after admitting he had placed a $50 bet on his own primary race through Kalshi, one of the platforms now targeted.
Tribal gaming groups, religious organizations, and civic coalitions all voiced support for both bills during hearings. Tribal representatives cited concerns about encroachment on their regulated gaming operations.
A potential loophole: single-currency sweepstakes
SF 4474 specifically targets "dual-currency" sweepstakes models that distinguish between play money and redeemable coins. Platforms using only a single currency for promotional play may fall outside the bill's definition of a banned sweepstakes casino. This nuance could create a gap that some sweepstakes-only operators may test if the bill becomes law.
Senate Minority Leader Johnson warned during debate:
"It's almost a guarantee that every state that's passed this so far has dealt with a lawsuit."
Corporate ownership angle: which platforms are affected
Major sweepstakes casino operators with Minnesota players could be impacted. Zula Casino, for instance, has a parent company gaming presence in multiple states. If the ban passes, these operators may need to geoblock Minnesota users or face legal consequences. The Fortune Wins platform and its sister brand, Clubs Casino, may also export millions of dollars in risk.
Attorney General Ellison already took action in 2025, sending cease-and-desist demands to 14 companies including Zula Casino, Fortune Coins, and LuckyLand Slots. The proposed ban would give that pursuit legislative teeth.
Timeline and next steps
Both bills move to the Minnesota House with a May 18, 2026 deadline for enactment. If passed in the House and signed by the governor, the bans would go into effect at dates specified in each measure. Operators should consult legal counsel and explore exclusion orders from Minnesota, equivalent to over 60% of legal restrictions placed throughout the country.
Other pending business includes potential lawsuits, as at least five states that enacted similar bans are currently litigating. A sweepstakes industry trade group may coordinate a legal response.
The outcome in Minnesota may influence similar bills in other Midwestern states. Connecticut, Nevada, Vermont, Pennsylvania, and nearly a dozen other jurisdictions in discussion stages could resolve with similar posturing once Minnesota's final results are known.
What this means for players
Minnesota players currently using sweepstakes casinos may need to withdraw stored sweeps coins promptly as passage lawsuits and eventual onset leaves secondary outcomes uncertain. Operator sweepstake rules typically allow 30 to 90 days after a market closure to offer user coin redemption. Vendors including Spinfinite, Stake.us and Legendz will closely monitor legislator posturing looking to develop reserve fund outcomes depending upon framework of state insurance testing data moving for alternate coverage builds after those deposits land prior code window market of opportunity reading off 25 recent polls counts.
Proprietary brands under single-currency only model may command market shares quickly among still clear directional players wishing alternate ability where their company cash flows from.
Sources & References (11)
- [1]Predictive market wagering ban added to public safety package that ...
Regulatory source · Tier 1 · house.mn.gov · Accessed 2026-05-05T22:02:57.030Z
- [2]Online gambling companies want to put casinos in Minnesotans ...
Source · Unclassified · facebook.com · Accessed 2026-05-05T22:02:56.305Z
- [3][PDF] Citizens Against Gambling Expansion
Regulatory source · Tier 1 · house.mn.gov · Accessed 2026-05-05
- [4]SF 4474 Introduction - 94th Legislature (2025 - MN Revisor's Office
Regulatory source · Tier 1 · revisor.mn.gov · Accessed 2026-05-05
- [5][PDF] S.F. No. 4474 - MN Revisor's Office
Regulatory source · Tier 1 · revisor.mn.gov · Accessed 2026-05-05
- [6]Prediction markets ban passes MN Senate: Trump administration ...
Source · Unclassified · fox9.com · Accessed 2026-05-05T22:02:57.030Z
- [7]igaming.org
Source · Unclassified · igaming.org
- [8]Minnesota Senate Passes Prediction Market and Sweepstakes ...
Source · Unclassified · igamingtoday.com · Accessed 2026-05-05T22:02:56.305Z
- [9]Minnesota approves prediction markets and sweepstakes bans
Source · Unclassified · affpapa.com · Accessed 2026-05-05T22:02:56.305Z
- [10]Minnesota Moves to Outlaw Sweepstakes Casinos - Yahoo
Source · Unclassified · yahoo.com · Accessed 2026-05-05
- [11]'Effectively allowing online gambling': Minnesota lawmakers move to ...
Source · Unclassified · fox9.com · Accessed 2026-05-05


