Skip to navigationSkip to main content
NewsSweepstakes3 min read

Three States Send Sweepstakes Casino Bans to Governors

Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Tennessee each passed bills targeting sweepstakes casinos. Governors have 5-10 days to sign, veto, or let them become law. At least three states have bans pending enactment in 2026.

ByCasinoRankr Editorial Team|Updated June 21, 2026

Key takeaways - Louisiana HB 53 adds sweepstakes casinos to the state's racketeering definition, with penalties up to 50 years in prison and $1 million fines.

  • Oklahoma SB 1589 classifies operating sweepstakes casinos as a Class C felony, with up to 30 days jail and $2,000 in fines.
  • Tennessee HB 1885/SB 2136 bans platforms using virtual, dual-currency, or multi-currency systems that mimic lottery, slots, sports betting, table games, and video poker.

Sweepstakes Casino bans hit three states at once Lawmakers in Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Tennessee have all passed bills that aim to restrict or outright ban sweepstakes casinos.

Each bill now sits on its governor's desk for final action. Louisiana's HB 53 would reclassify sweepstakes casino operations as racketeering. The bill adds illegal gambling - including sweepstakes platforms - to the definition of racketeering, carrying penalties of up to 50 years and fines up to $1 million. Oklahoma's SB 1589 targets both operators and suppliers.

Under the bill, running a sweepstakes casino becomes a Class C felony punishable by up to 30 days in jail and a $2,000 fine. Tennessee took a broader approach. HB 1885/SB 2136 bans any platform that uses virtual, dual-currency, or multi-currency systems to mimic lottery, slot machines, sports betting, table games, and video poker. The bill gives state regulators expanded investigation and enforcement powers.

Governors hold the final word in 10 days (or 5) Each state gives its governor different timeframes to act before a bill becomes law without a signature.

In Louisiana and Tennessee, governors have 10 days (excluding Sundays). Oklahoma's governor gets 5 days, also excluding Sundays. Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry previously vetoed a sweepstakes casino ban.

His administration has nonetheless pursued cease-and-desist enforcement against sweepstakes casinos, indicating enforcement priority. It's unclear whether he'll sign HB 53 or veto again. Oklahoma's bill came after input from tribal nations. The state's tribes previously pushed a sports betting bill, but the measure failed amid tensions between lawmakers and Gov.

Kevin Stitt over tribal compacts.

Growing list of states acting against sweepstakes casinos If all three governors sign, Oklahoma would join Maine and Indiana as states that banned sweepstakes casinos in 2026.

States like California, New Jersey, and New York passed similar bans in 2025. That's six states in roughly a year - and it reflects a clear national trend. Since 2025, legislators across the country have moved to prohibit sweepstakes casino models, with more than a dozen states introducing legislation to restrict or ban dual-currency platforms entirely. Expect more states to introduce similar legislation.

Penalties vary widely across the three bills The three bills take noticeably different approaches.

Louisiana's racketeering framework is the harshest by far. If a district attorney pursues racketeering charges, an operator could face decades in prison - on par with charges for violent crime. The million-dollar fine also stands out. Oklahoma takes a lighter approach: a Class C felony brings up to 30 days in jail and relatively small fines.

That's minimal compared to Louisiana's penalties. But this bill also targets suppliers, meaning software makers and distribution partners could face prosecution. Tennessee deliberately went broad. Rather than tie enforcement to specific penalties, the law hands the state investigative power to pursue different models as they emerge.

What this means for players If you're on an operator like Legendz, Fortune Wins, or American Luck, these bills target the sites you probably use.

If they're signed into law, the operators can't accept Louisiana, Oklahoma, or Tennessee players. They'll likely restrict access just like states enact sports betting laws. Operators have shown in other states that geoblocking kicks in the day a ban law takes effect.

Next steps and timeline All three governors will take action by mid-to-late May 2026.

News sites should track each decision as they come. Once signed, effective dates vary - but bans usually take effect within 30 to 90 days. Watch for state regulators announced guidance too.

Sources

  1. [1]
    SB123

    Regulatory source · Tier 1 · legis.la.gov · Accessed 2026-05-08

    Supports: Bill record: SB123

    Source notes: Claim mapping inferred from the stored source title; verify the source before relying on material claims.

  2. [2]
    Oklahoma passes bill targeting sweepstakes casinos.

    Source · Unclassified · yogonet.com · Accessed 2026-05-08T18:00:08.805Z

    Supports: Reported topic: Oklahoma passes bill targeting sweepstakes casinos.

    Source notes: Claim mapping inferred from the stored source title; verify the source before relying on material claims.

  3. [3]
    Iowa, Louisiana Enforcement Bills and Minnesota Sweeps.

    Source · Unclassified · gamblinginsider.com · Accessed 2026-05-08T18:00:08.805Z

    Supports: Reported topic: Iowa, Louisiana Enforcement Bills and Minnesota Sweeps.

    Source notes: Claim mapping inferred from the stored source title; verify the source before relying on material claims.

  4. [4]
    Three States Send Bills Against Sweepstakes Casinos To.

    Source · Unclassified · legalsportsreport.com · Accessed 2026-05-08T18:00:08.805Z

    Supports: Reported topic: Three States Send Bills Against Sweepstakes Casinos To.

    Source notes: Claim mapping inferred from the stored source title; verify the source before relying on material claims.

  5. [5]
    Federal government sues three states for trying to regulate. - PBS

    Source · Unclassified · pbs.org · Accessed 2026-05-08T18:00:07.912Z

    Supports: Reported topic: Federal government sues three states for trying to regulate. - PBS

    Source notes: Claim mapping inferred from the stored source title; verify the source before relying on material claims.

  6. [6]
    Sweepstakes Casino Excluded States by Operator (2026)

    Source · Unclassified · gamblinginsider.com · Accessed 2026-05-08T18:00:07.912Z

    Supports: Reported topic: Sweepstakes Casino Excluded States by Operator (2026)

    Source notes: Claim mapping inferred from the stored source title; verify the source before relying on material claims.

  7. [7]
    Proposed sweepstakes casino bans advance in three states

    Source · Unclassified · igamingbusiness.com · Accessed 2026-05-08T18:00:07.912Z

    Supports: Reported topic: Proposed sweepstakes casino bans advance in three states

    Source notes: Claim mapping inferred from the stored source title; verify the source before relying on material claims.

  8. [8]
    Indiana legislature sends sweepstakes casino ban to Governor Braun

    Source · Unclassified · igamingbusiness.com · Accessed 2026-05-08

    Supports: Reported topic: Indiana legislature sends sweepstakes casino ban to Governor Braun

    Source notes: Claim mapping inferred from the stored source title; verify the source before relying on material claims.

  9. [9]
    Indiana Bill to Ban Sweepstakes Casinos Advances - TheLines.com

    Source · Unclassified · thelines.com · Accessed 2026-05-08

    Supports: Reported topic: Indiana Bill to Ban Sweepstakes Casinos Advances - TheLines.com

    Source notes: Claim mapping inferred from the stored source title; verify the source before relying on material claims.

Tags

sweepstakesus-regulationshutdownlegalization

Share this article

Related Sweepstakes Articles

Frequently Asked Questions

Questions about this sweepstakes article

Not for long if HB 53 is signed. The bill adds sweepstakes casino operations to Louisiana's racketeering definition. Even before the bill, the state issued 40 cease-and-desist letters to operators - so enforcement was already a priority.
SB 1589 would make operating one a Class C felony. If the governor signs, operators must prohibit Oklahoma players from accessing their platforms. The bill also targets suppliers, not just the casinos themselves.
HB 1885/SB 2136 would ban any platform using virtual, dual-currency, or multi-currency systems to mimic casino games. Tennessee's approach is broader than most states - it gives regulators power to pursue new models as they emerge.
A veto blocks it for now. But in Louisiana, the state has issued 40 cease-and-desist letters directly against sweepstakes casinos. Even a veto might not stop enforcement actions.
Those dates vary by bill. Typically 30 to 90 days after the governor signs. Operators then stop accepting new players from that state.