Scoop

Scoop at a glance

Scoop launched in 2025, runs through My Scoop LLC, and ships a sweepstakes lobby with 3,240+ games, bigger than most of the US sweeps field. New users get 10K GC + 1 SC at signup. The entry-tier purchase is 20K GC + 20 SC for $9.99. No daily bonus on file, $20 / 20 SC minimum redemption, payouts cited at 2-7 days via bank transfer or gift cards. Available in 35 states.

That's the quick read. Below is what the numbers actually mean.

The bonus math

Signup is 10K GC + 1 SC, basically a token. 1 SC = $1 of redeemable value, so you're getting a single dollar to test the platform plus a stack of GC for free play. Compared to Stake.us (5 SC + 250K GC) or Chumba (2 SC + 2M GC) signup offers, this is on the thin side. Don't get me wrong, free is free, but if you're shopping signup value alone, Scoop isn't the headline number.

The actual entry decision is the $9.99 first-purchase package: 20K GC + 20 SC. That's $0.50 per SC at face value, with the GC bundled in. Industry context: Pulsz and McLuck first-purchase tiers usually fall in the $0.30-0.50 per SC range depending on promotion windows. Scoop's $0.50 cost-per-SC sits at the high end of that band, not exceptional, not predatory.

The math people actually need: 20 SC redeemable at $1/SC = $20 face value for $9.99 paid. That's a +100% nominal value on entry, but only if you redeem the full 20 SC without playthrough loss. With sweepstakes game edge running ~5-8% on slots depending on RTP, expect to bleed a portion of that SC stack before you hit the $20 redemption floor. Realistic effective value lands closer to $14-17 of cash-equivalent if you play the SC straight through.

Still net-positive on a single-shot first purchase, which is the standard sweeps entry model.

There's no daily bonus on file. McLuck, Pulsz, and Chumba all run some form of daily SC drip, typically 0.3-1 SC/day depending on tier. Scoop's marketing surface implies a daily mechanic, but Public records include 'None' committed for that field. I wouldn't budget on it until a documented daily SC schedule shows up.

Cost per SC, in context

Entry-tier first-purchase pricing across the field, approximate from current sites:

• Scoop: $9.99 → 20 SC = $0.50/SC
• Pulsz: ~$10 entry → ~25-35 SC depending on promo = $0.29-0.40/SC
• McLuck: ~$10 entry → ~22-30 SC depending on promo = $0.33-0.45/SC
• Stake.us: $9.99 → ~22 SC + 250K GC = ~$0.45/SC

Scoop is at the high end of the entry-tier range. Take the comparison with a grain of salt, promotional first-purchase pricing on every sweeps site changes weekly and the headline numbers move with seasonal campaigns.

Game catalog and providers

3,240+ games is a real number for a sweeps platform. Stake.us runs around 700, McLuck around 700, Pulsz in the 700-1,000 range. Scoop's catalog lines up with the larger global social casino aggregators, not the typical US sweeps lobby.

Provider list: 3 Oaks, 7777 Gaming, Betsoft, CT Interactive, ElaGames, Eurasian Gaming, Felix Gaming, Gaming Corps, Gamzix, Hacksaw Gaming, ICONIC21, Jili Games, KA Gaming, Kahzuu, Mancala Gaming, NetGaming, Novomatic, Playson, Spinoro, TaDa Gaming.

Worth flagging:

• Hacksaw Gaming, strong Bonus Hunt slots, well-respected RNG. Their inclusion is a meaningful signal.
• Betsoft, Playson, Novomatic, established names, broad availability across the legitimate side of the market.
• 3 Oaks, Gaming Corps, NetGaming, second-tier studios with solid releases.
• 7777 Gaming, CT Interactive, Eurasian Gaming, Jili Games, KA Gaming, TaDa Gaming, Asian-market and Eastern European studios. Some of these don't typically appear on US sweeps sites at all.

What you won't find: Pragmatic Play (they exited the US sweeps market in September 2025), Nolimit City, NetEnt, Big Time Gaming. The typical Stake.us / Chumba A-tier studio mix isn't here. If your reason to play sweeps is to hunt Razor Returns, San Quentin, or Tombstone RIP, Scoop won't have them.

The Asian-studio presence is unusual enough to flag. From what I can tell, Scoop is sourcing from a different aggregator backend than the US sweeps mainline. That's not negative on its face, KA Gaming and Jili have functional slot product, but RTPs, hit rates, and feature triggers on those studios are less documented in English-language community testing than the Hacksaw/Pragmatic/Nolimit catalog. Track your own RTP if it matters to you.

Live dealer is on the list, mobile app isn't. Sweepstakes live dealer is rare and worth noting, most US sweeps sites either don't run live tables or run them through restricted wrappers. Scoop running a live dealer product is a real differentiator. We don't have provider attribution for the live tables on file, so I can't tell you if it's an Evolution-style backend or something else without verifying directly.

Redemption: where the rubber meets the road

This is the section every sweeps review should lead with on reliability. The numbers:

• Minimum redemption: $20 / 20 SC
• Window: 2-7 days
• Methods: bank transfer, gift cards

The $20 floor is one of the lower minimums in the space. Pulsz sits at $100, McLuck at $50, Chumba at $50, Stake.us at $10. Scoop's $20 minimum is friendly, small redemptions are possible without grinding a long stack first.

The 2-7 day window is normal for ACH/bank transfer rails. Stake.us crypto can settle in hours, but Scoop doesn't run crypto redemption based on the methods listed. Bank transfer is the slow side of the ecosystem, 2-7 days is what you should expect from a competent operator and a worst case for slow KYC.

Gift cards as a redemption method is the part to flag. This isn't standard. Most US sweeps sites redeem to cash via ACH, check, or Skrill, some run crypto. Gift card redemption can technically operate under the sweepstakes model, but it's a structure that should make you ask questions. Gift cards have lower legal-tender status, are easier to cap redemption value on, and are sometimes the fallback when an operator doesn't have full banking partnerships.

I haven't looked into Scoop's specific gift-card mechanic too much yet, take that with a grain of salt, but if a sweeps site is offering gift cards as one of two redemption methods, I'd want to test ACH first to see if the cash rail clears. The 2-7 day estimate is what we have on file. I haven't run a community-tracked redemptions sample on Scoop because the platform is too new for a useful n.

Geographic restrictions

Scoop blocks 15 states: California, Connecticut, Delaware, Idaho, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Washington, and West Virginia. Available in the other 35.

The block list reads like a standard sweepstakes-cautious operator. Washington and Idaho are universal blocks, both states have explicit sweeps prohibitions. New York and Connecticut are on most blocklists since the 2024-2025 enforcement wave. Michigan, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey block sweeps in part because they have regulated real-money online gaming. Louisiana and Montana are common defensive blocks.

California's inclusion is the noteworthy one, a lot of sweeps sites still serve California even after the 2024 AB 831 noise. Scoop's choice to block California suggests the legal team is risk-averse, which is the conservative move and probably the right one.

What's not on the block list: Texas. That's a notable position. Most sweeps sites have either left Texas or are about to. Scoop's continued availability there is either a calculated play on the AG enforcement timeline or an oversight. Either way, if you're a Texas player using sweeps, recognize that the regulatory wind is blowing toward more blocks, not fewer.

Operator and trust signals

Operator is My Scoop LLC. No parent company on file. No published license number, which is normal for sweeps under the no-purchase-necessary model rather than a defect, sweeps don't operate under gaming commission licenses the way cash-playthrough casinos do.

The platform launched in 2025. As of this writing (May 2026), Scoop is roughly 6-12 months old depending on launch month. That's a short track record. I have a hard rule about new sweeps platforms: do not load up SC purchases beyond what you'd be comfortable losing entirely until the operator has 12+ months of consistent payout history.

We don't have that yet on Scoop because the platform doesn't have the operating history.

Other trust questions you should run yourself:

• KYC strictness, first redemption is the test, not the second
• Terms of service for redemption caps, weekly limits, account-holder verification
• Sweepstakes rules document, separate from the standard terms, that's the actual contest mechanic
• Whether 'My Scoop LLC' resolves to a real US-registered entity with an address you can find

I'm not going to make a corporate ownership claim I can't defend. My Scoop LLC is what's on the operator field. I haven't traced it to a holding company or an offshore parent because there's nothing in our source set that pins one down.

How Scoop ranks in the field

Pull the field of US sweeps sites and Scoop is mid-tier on most metrics with a couple of standout dimensions:

• Game catalog size: top tier (3,240). Larger than ~80% of the US sweeps field.
• Provider quality: mid-tier. Hacksaw and Betsoft anchor it. No premium A-tier roster (no Nolimit, no NetEnt, no Pragmatic post-2025 exit).
• Welcome offer: thin. 1 SC at signup is below the field median.
• First-purchase value: mid-tier. $0.50/SC is on the high side of entry pricing.
• Minimum redemption: friendly. $20 is one of the lower floors.
• Redemption methods: unusual. Gift card option is non-standard.
• Track record: thin. 6-12 months operational history.

Ranking Scoop against Stake.us, McLuck, Pulsz, and Chumba on overall risk-adjusted user value, Scoop slots into the middle. It's not in the top quartile of the sweeps field, that real estate is held by operators with 2+ years of clean payout history. It's also not in the bottom quartile, the catalog and entry economics are real product.

The honest take

Scoop is a competent newer entrant with a big game catalog, a thin signup, mid-tier first-purchase value, and a question mark over the gift-card redemption mechanic. The platform isn't broken, but it isn't proven either. Six to twelve months in, the only way to know whether redemption holds up is to test it with a small SC stack first.

Three things I'd want to see before treating Scoop as a long-term sweeps home:

• A documented daily SC drip, or honest acknowledgment that there isn't one
• Community-source-backed payout notes performance, sample of 50+ redemptions across both methods
• Clarity on whether the Asian-studio backend has US-jurisdiction RNG certifications

The affiliate disclosure: yes, the r_hkgambler referral parameter on the tracking link means CasinoRankr earns a commission if you sign up through us and make a purchase. That doesn't move our ranking. We rank Scoop where the data puts it, and right now the data puts it in the middle of the field, interesting catalog, untested operator history, redemption mechanic worth testing in small dollars first.

The only way for a sweeps casino to make money is if you, on average, lose more than you redeem. Scoop isn't different from any other operator on that fundamental. The 5-8% game edge on slots, the playthrough required before redemption, the SC accumulation friction, same EV math regardless of whether the lobby has 3,240+ games or 700.

PLEASE DO NOT PLAY WITH MONEY YOU CANNOT AFFORD TO LOSE.