Skip to main content

SWEEPSTAKES · OPERATOR PROFILE

Fliff Social

Profile updated 5 May 2026

Fliff Social is a sports-first sweepstakes app run by Fliff Inc. out of King of Prussia, PA, and the mobile UX is genuinely the best.

Bottom line

A polished social sportsbook app, not a casino. The trade-offs: an unresolved Illinois cease-and-desist, not offered in California, and full identity checks before the first redemption.

By HKGambler · Founder & Lead Reviewer, CasinoRankr · updated 5 May 2026. Authorship, not a review event.

Add to your shortlist

Choose a state to see access

Access is recorded per state. Rubric scores, reader sentiment and this profile do not depend on it.

CasinoRankr visit link: not offered. No commercial visit link is offered for Fliff Social here; its research profile remains available.

Add to your shortlist

4.0 rubric score · method range 3.0–5.0 · 48% positive from 163 reader votes

Two different measures with different limits. Neither certifies a payout.

The facts that matter first

Cash minimum
Not confirmed
No confirmed value
Processing window
Not confirmed
No confirmed value

Redemption methods
Not confirmed
No confirmed value
Recorded operator
Not recorded
No confirmed value

Each fact links to the record it came from. No deadline for completing a redemption request is recorded for Fliff Social — a missing deadline is not evidence that none applies.

CALCULATED RUBRIC SCORE

4.0 · method range 3.0–5.0

Position 11 of 89 scored sweepstakes casinos

Equal totals are listed A–Z, which is not an order of merit. A calculated result, not an editorial verdict and not a safety guarantee.

Components on the same 3.0–5.0 range, read 24 Sep 2026 — Games 3.0 · Bonuses 3.7 · Trust 4.2 · Payouts 3.9 · UX 5.0. Trust & Safety takes no complaint or enforcement input. Equal totals are listed A–Z, which is not an order of merit. A calculated result, not an editorial verdict and not a safety guarantee.

READER SENTIMENT

48% positive

163 votes · 79 up / 84 down

Self-selected opinion. Not verified players, payout outcomes or safety.

Strengths and limitations

From the published Fliff Social analysis: 5 recorded strengths and 6 recorded limitations.

5 recorded strengths and 6 recorded limitations, from the published analysis.

Recorded strengths

  • Mobile app UX is the strongest in the social-sportsbook category (4.8 App Store rating, n > 50k)

    Recorded in the published analysis.

  • Operator clearly identified as Fliff Inc., King of Prussia, PA, not an anonymous offshore shell

    Recorded in the published analysis.

  • Sports market depth (NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL, college, soccer, tennis) beats every social-casino sports tab

    Recorded in the published analysis.

  • Daily-claim mechanics (5K FC + 1 FC) make small-stake play viable without buying Coins

    Recorded in the published analysis.

  • Redemption thresholds, methods, and verification rules are all publicly documented

    Recorded in the published analysis.

  • Mobile app UX is the strongest in the social-sportsbook category (4.8 App Store rating, n > 50k)
  • Operator clearly identified as Fliff Inc., King of Prussia, PA, not an anonymous offshore shell
  • Sports market depth (NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL, college, soccer, tennis) beats every social-casino sports tab
  • Daily-claim mechanics (5K FC + 1 FC) make small-stake play viable without buying Coins
  • Redemption thresholds, methods, and verification rules are all publicly documented

Recorded limitations

  • 19 prohibited states, roughly 4x the category baseline. no VPN workaround at the redemption gate

    Recorded in the published analysis.

  • Illinois Gaming Board cease-and-desist dated February 4, 2026 is unresolved

    Recorded in the published analysis.

  • California pivoted to Superstars peer-to-peer DFS in January 2026, the social sportsbook itself is not available there

    Recorded in the published analysis.

  • $50 minimum redemption floor is on the higher end of the category

    Recorded in the published analysis.

  • Welcome offer (5K GC + 1 SC) is small in redeemable value, roughly $1 at signup, before daily claims and AMOE

    Recorded in the published analysis.

  • Full KYC including possible biometric verification before first redemption

    Recorded in the published analysis.

  • 19 prohibited states, roughly 4x the category baseline. no VPN workaround at the redemption gate
  • Illinois Gaming Board cease-and-desist dated February 4, 2026 is unresolved
  • California pivoted to Superstars peer-to-peer DFS in January 2026, the social sportsbook itself is not available there
  • $50 minimum redemption floor is on the higher end of the category
  • Welcome offer (5K GC + 1 SC) is small in redeemable value, roughly $1 at signup, before daily claims and AMOE
  • Full KYC including possible biometric verification before first redemption

“Not confirmed” means CasinoRankr holds no current record for that field. “Operator-stated” means the operator published it and CasinoRankr has not verified it.

Payments & redemption

Each row links to the record it came from. A recorded value is not a verification.

Cash minimum
Not confirmed
No confirmed value
Processing window
Not confirmed
No confirmed value
Incomplete-request deadline
Not confirmed
No deadline for completing a redemption request is recorded for Fliff Social. A missing deadline is not evidence that none applies.
Redemption methods
Not confirmed
No confirmed value

Games and product

What the catalogue looks like and what the operator says it offers. A capture does not establish availability in your state.

Operator-stated

The recorded figures are the operator’s own and are kept behind the disclosure below. None of it is a CasinoRankr test.

No catalogue figures are recorded for this operator.

Game count, provider diversity, game types and a live-dealer adjustment are the inputs behind the Games & Variety component value of 3.0. No CasinoRankr test of the catalogue accompanies this profile.

Trust is a set of questions, not one badge.

Who operates it?
Not recorded is the recorded operator. The record does not establish beneficial ownership.
What supports the claims?
Nine dated source records, nine carrying an access date. Open them below.
What do readers think?
79 upvotes and 84 downvotes. These are reader signals, not independently verified outcomes.

Read the editorial assessment

The complete published analysis, with every caveat it carries.

Fliff Social on the five components — each on the same 3.0–5.0 method range

  • 4.2

    Trust & Safety · weight 24%

    What it measures: operator age percentile, with fixed adjustments for a published licence and for provably-fair games.

    When it matters: it does not screen complaints or red flags — neither is an input.

  • 3.9

    Payouts & Speed · weight 22%

    What it measures: payout-speed percentile, weighted above the count of recorded redemption methods.

    When it matters: a rank against other listed operators, not a measured payout time.

  • 3.0

    Games & Variety · weight 18%

    What it measures: percentiles for game count, provider diversity and game types, plus a live-dealer adjustment.

    When it matters: catalogue breadth, not game quality or return to player.

  • 3.7

    Bonuses & Promos · weight 18%

    What it measures: percentile for the number of recorded bonus features.

    When it matters: it counts features; it does not weigh their terms or their value.

  • 5.0

    UX & Mobile · weight 18%

    What it measures: percentiles for app-store rating and platform features, plus a native-app adjustment.

    When it matters: reflects a published store rating, not first-hand use.

The percentages are CasinoRankr’s weights, not values for this operator. Every component is ranked against all active listed operators and mapped onto 3.0–5.0, and the five recombine to the score shown above. Trust & Safety takes no complaint or enforcement input, so a high value there is not a clean-record finding.

Fliff Social lands for me as a strong social-sportsbook product with real usability advantages, but one that now carries meaningful state-by-state and enforcement risk that users need to price into any decision. The product case is built on the operator is named, the rules explain the Fliff Coin versus Fliff Cash split in unusual detail, and the app remains one of the more legible social-sportsbook products in the market, while the trust discount comes from the Illinois Gaming Board said in February 2026 that Fliff was offering illegal sports playthrough in Illinois, and the company spent January 2026 changing its California approach through Superstars peer-to-peer DFS. If you are comfortable operating inside the exact rules the operator publishes today, Fliff Social can make sense for a narrower use case. If you want a simpler product with fewer document conflicts, I would look first at Rebet or Fliff Superstars before parking serious time or money here.

Published review record

Read the original published review in full

Fliff Social is the most polished social-sportsbook app in the category, run by Fliff Inc., but the 19-state exclusion list, $50 redemption floor, and a February 2026 Illinois cease-and-desist make this a narrower fit than the headline 4.8 App Store rating implies.

Key takeaways

  • Fliff Social verdict: Good Option.
  • Fliff Social is a sports-first sweepstakes app run by Fliff Inc. out of King of Prussia, PA, and the mobile UX is genuinely the best in the social-sportsbook category, but the prohibited-state list runs 19 deep and the operator is now navigating a February 2026 Illinois cease-and-desist plus a January 2026 California product pivot. Useful for sports-first users in the 31 supported states who can clear a $50 redemption floor and full KYC, less useful for casual players or anyone in a regulatory-pressure state.
  • Strength: Mobile app UX is the strongest in the social-sportsbook category (4.8 App Store rating, n > 50k)
  • Also worth noting: Operator clearly identified as Fliff Inc., King of Prussia, PA, not an anonymous offshore shell

Fliff Social is the social-sportsbook leg of Fliff Inc.the King of Prussia, Pennsylvania operator that launched the app in 2019 and now sits in the awkward middle of the U.S. Sweepstakes-sportsbook category. The product is real, the operator is named, and the rules are detailed. The trust picture is also more constrained than most reviews of this site admit, because the prohibited-state list runs 19 deep and the legal perimeter has tightened twice in the last six months.

Here's what the data actually shows.

Fliff Social ranks mid-pack in our 2026 sweepstakes-sportsbook coverage. Compared to the rest of the field, Rebet, McLuck's sports tab, ParlayPlay, and Fliff's own Superstars DFS pivot, it has the most polished mobile UX and the broadest sport coverage, but it also carries the deepest state-exclusion footprint of any social sportsbook we cover. The 4.8 App Store rating reflects the product experience, not the regulatory exposure.

Who Runs This and Where

Fliff Inc. is a Pennsylvania-domiciled company headquartered at 840 First Ave, Suite 400, King of Prussia, PA 19406. No parent company sits above it that the operator discloses publicly, Fliff Inc. is the entity on the terms, the sweepstakes rules, and the Illinois cease-and-desist.

Public sources don't carry a license number for Fliff Social, and that's because there isn't one to carry, this is a sweepstakes operator, not a sportsbooks with published regulatory details, so it doesn't operate under a state gaming license the way DraftKings or FanDuel do.

That distinction matters a lot for how you should price risk on this site. A sweepstakes operator is licensing nothing and is essentially betting that its dual-currency structure (Fliff Coins for social play, Fliff Cash for prize-redeemable play) keeps it outside the definition of "sports playthrough" in each state's gaming code. Illinois disagreed with that play on February 4, 2026 and issued a cease-and-desist letter. California forced a product pivot in January 2026, when Fliff launched Superstars peer-to-peer DFS to keep some version of the brand operating in-state.

Both events are documented and dated, neither has fully resolved.

The interface is genuinely good. The friction starts when you try to redeem.

Bonus Math: 5K GC + 1 SC, Plus Daily Claims

The headline new-user offer is 5,000 Fliff Coins plus 1 Fliff Cash, with a $5 first purchase converting to $50 in Fliff Coins. Daily login adds another 5,000 Fliff Coins plus 1 Fliff Cash on a recurring basis. The published promo path uses the bonus offer through the affiliate link.

Let me show the math on the welcome offer because the headline number is misleading. 5,000 Fliff Coins are entertainment-only currency, they have zero redemption value.

The redeemable side of the welcome is 1 Fliff Cash, which the operator values at $1. So the actual cash-equivalent welcome value at signup is roughly $1 of redeemable balance, plus whatever Fliff Cash you accumulate through daily claims and the AMOE path.

Compare that to Rebet, which lands closer to $2.50, $3 in redeemable currency at signup, to McLuck's sports tab, where the cross-promotion from the casino side adds a more meaningful SC float on day one. Fliff Social isn't competing on welcome size. It's competing on daily-claim consistency and the depth of the sports market.

The $5 first-purchase offer ($5 → $50 in Fliff Coins) is a 10x Coin multiplier, but again, those are entertainment Coins, not redeemable Cash.

Don't confuse the two. The only path from a paid purchase to a redemption is through the bundled Fliff Cash that comes attached to Coin purchases, and you have to play through that Fliff Cash before it becomes redeemable.

The minimum redemption is 50 Fliff Cash ($50), processed via bank transfer, instant bank transfer, Skrill, Visa/Mastercard, or gift cards. Redemption window is 1-5 business days per the operator's published rules. That 50 SC floor is on the higher end of the category, McLuck and Stake.us both clear at lower thresholds, and it's a real friction point for casual players who want to redeem small balances.

Geography: 19 States Excluded

The prohibited-state list for the Fliff Cash sweepstakes layer is one of the longest in the category.

The full set: Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Tennessee, Washington, and West Virginia.

That's 19 states out of 50, roughly 38% of the country blocked from the prize-redemption side of the product. Compared to the rest of the field: most sweepstakes casinos exclude 5 states (the standard Idaho/Michigan/Nevada/Washington base, sometimes plus one or two others). Fliff's exclusion footprint is roughly 4x the category baseline.

The reason is regulatory pressure. States with active sports-playthrough enforcement regimes, Michigan, New Jersey, Tennessee, New York, Colorado, Connecticut, West Virginia, have either explicitly told Fliff to stop or are jurisdictions where the operator has decided not to push.

California is on the list because of the DFS pivot, the social sportsbook itself is not available there, and Fliff Superstars (the DFS product) is what runs in its place. Illinois isn't on the prohibited-state list as published, but the February 4, 2026 cease-and-desist from the Illinois Gaming Board is a meaningful signal that the de-facto availability picture in Illinois is changing.

The operator does enforce geo restrictions at the location-detection layer, not just at signup. A VPN won't get you past a location check at redemption. If your home state is on the prohibited list, the practical answer is no, there's no workaround that survives the verification step.

The Product Itself

Fliff Social is sports-first.

There's no casino lobby, no slots, no live dealer, Industry reporting show 0 games and "Proprietary" as the sole provider, which is accurate, the product is the sportsbook interface, the picks engine, and the social/community features layered on top.

Sport coverage runs across NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL, college football and basketball, soccer (international and MLS), tennis, and motorsports. The interface supports straight plays, parlays, same-game parlays, and props. Live betting is available. The mobile app is the default experience, the desktop site exists but is clearly a secondary surface.

From a UX perspective this is the strongest mobile sportsbook product in the social/sweeps category.

The 4.8 App Store rating is real, not pumped, I've checked the review distribution and the volume is high enough (n >, 50k) that it's not a fake-review situation. The app loads fast, the play slip is clean, and the live-betting interface is more responsive than what most regulated U.S. Sportsbooks ship.

The VIP system is a 10-level XP-based loyalty ladder running Rookie → Bronze → Silver → Gold → GOAT (with sub-tiers inside each band). XP is earned by playthrough Fliff Coins and completing daily challenges.

The rewards are mostly Coin boosts and occasional Fliff Cash drops at higher tiers, useful if you're a regular, not enough to base a decision on if you're new.

Redemption: $50 Floor, 1-5 Day Window, 5 Methods

This is the section where the trust discount actually shows up. The operator publishes:

  • Minimum redemption: 50 Fliff Cash ($50)
  • Processing window: 1-5 business days
  • Methods: Bank transfer, instant bank transfer, Skrill, Visa/Mastercard, gift cards
  • Verification: Government ID, proof of address, sometimes biometric facial scan, SSN validation for larger redemptions

1-5 business days is a reasonable published window. In practice, instant bank transfer and Skrill clear faster (often same-day for listed accounts), while standard bank transfer trends toward the 3-5 day end. Gift cards are usually the fastest path but cap at lower amounts.

The verification gate is the bigger friction than the processing time. Fliff requires full KYC before the first redemption, and the operator's stated right to ask for biometric verification on larger amounts is real, not boilerplate.

Plan on it. If you're not comfortable submitting a government ID and a selfie scan to a sweepstakes operator, this site is not for you.

The Illinois Cease-and-Desist

On February 4, 2026 the Illinois Gaming Board issued a cease-and-desist letter to Fliff Inc. Saying the company had been offering internet sports playthrough to Illinois users without the required authority. The letter is on the IGB's public document portal.

It's not a lawsuit, it's not a fine, it's a regulatory notice telling Fliff to stop operating in-state.

How this typically resolves in the sweepstakes-sportsbook category: the operator either pulls out of the state, modifies the product to argue it doesn't fall under the gaming definition the regulator cited, or fights the action in court. Fliff's California response (the Superstars DFS pivot) suggests the company is willing to ship product changes to keep operating in regulatory-pressure states. As of this review, Illinois is not on the published prohibited-state list, which means the operator's public position and the regulator's position are still in conflict.

Take that with a grain of salt, regulatory enforcement in the social-sportsbook category is moving fast in 2026, and the situation in Illinois could resolve in either direction within weeks. If you're in Illinois and considering Fliff, check the operator's current rules page on the day you sign up.

The status is genuinely fluid.

Compared to the Rest of the Field

Three direct comparisons that matter:

Fliff vs Rebet: Rebet is the closest comparable product. Rebet's welcome is roughly 2-3x larger in redeemable value, the prohibited-state list is shorter (around 6 states vs. Fliff's 19), and the social-betting features are arguably better. Fliff's edge over Rebet is the mobile app polish and the depth of in-game/live betting markets.

If you live in a state Rebet supports and Fliff doesn't, the question answers itself.

Fliff vs Fliff Superstars: Same operator, different product. Superstars is a peer-to-peer DFS layer that Fliff launched in January 2026, originally to keep operating in California. It's available in some states where the social sportsbook isn't. If you're in California, Superstars is the only Fliff-branded product you can access.

The redemption mechanics are similar, the play structure is fundamentally different, DFS contests vs. Straight plays/parlays.

Fliff vs McLuck's sports tab: McLuck is primarily a social casino with a sports tab grafted on. The sports market depth is much weaker than Fliff's, but the cross-promotion from the casino side gives McLuck a meaningfully larger SC float for users who play both sides. If you mostly want sports, Fliff is the better product.

If you want sports as a secondary feature alongside slots, McLuck makes more sense.

Who This Fits and Who Should Skip

Fliff Social makes sense if you're in a supported state (the 31 states not on the exclusion list), you want a sports-first social-betting experience, you're comfortable with full KYC including possible biometric verification, and you're willing to redeem in $50+ chunks. The mobile UX is genuinely the best in the category, the daily-claim cadence is consistent, and the operator's documentation is more transparent than most sweepstakes brands.

Skip it if you're in any of the 19 prohibited states (no workaround), if you want a casino lobby alongside the sportsbook (use McLuck or Stake.us instead), if you want a lower redemption floor than $50 (most competitors clear at $25-50, with some at lower thresholds for specific methods), or if the regulatory exposure bothers you enough that the Illinois letter and the California pivot feel like signals rather than noise.

The regulatory exposure is the thing I'd weight most heavily. The product itself is solid. The legal perimeter is what's uncertain.

My Take After Roughly Four Years of Use

When I first reviewed Fliff in 2022, I thought it was the most underrated product in the social-sportsbook space.

The interface was three years ahead of where the category was, the daily-claim mechanics were generous enough to make small-stake play viable without ever buying Coins, and the operator was visibly investing in product quality rather than just bonus marketing.

Four years later, the product is still good. The market context is what changed. The state-by-state regulatory pressure that wasn't really a thing in 2022-2023 is now the dominant variable in this category, and Fliff is in a more exposed position than most competitors because its product looks more like a real sportsbook than a typical social-casino sports tab. That's a feature for users in supported states.

It's also exactly why regulators are paying attention.

Don't get me wrong, Fliff Social is still a coherent product worth using if you're in a supported state and you understand what you're signing up for. But the old framing of "social sportsbook with no real legal risk" doesn't survive the 2026 evidence. The operator is actively reshaping the product to stay ahead of enforcement actions, and that reshape is going to keep happening.

The game edge Reality Check

Sweepstakes-sportsbook math works the same way as regulated-sportsbook math, just with a currency layer in front of it. The vig on standard NFL spreads at Fliff is in the -110 range, same as DraftKings and FanDuel, which means the book is taking roughly 4.5% on a balanced market.

That's the operator's edge, and it doesn't disappear because the currency is called Fliff Cash instead of dollars.

Layer in the playthrough requirement on Fliff Cash before redemption, plus the $50 floor, plus the verification gate, and the effective edge against a casual user is meaningfully higher than the headline -110 vig suggests. The vig exists because the book needs you to lose slightly more than you win. The sweepstakes wrapper exists because it lets the operator run that book in states where it couldn't operate as a sportsbooks with published license details. Both things are true at the same time.

PLEASE DO NOT PLAY WITH MONEY YOU CANNOT AFFORD TO LOSE. The social-sportsbook framing makes this product feel lower-stakes than a regulated book.

The math doesn't care about the framing. Set a bankroll, set a stop-loss, and don't chase. That advice is the same on Fliff as it is on any other sportsbook in the category.

Frequently asked questions (8)

Legality & availability

Is Fliff legal-context notes for Illinois?
The Illinois Gaming Board said on February 4, 2026 that Fliff had offered internet sports playthrough in Illinois without authorization, so I would not treat Illinois as a safe jurisdiction for the product.

Payments & KYC

Can you redeem Fliff Cash for money?
Yes, but only after satisfying the rules. The current public sweepstakes rules set a 50 eligible Fliff Cash minimum redemption request.

General

Is Fliff a real sportsbook?
It is better described as a social sportsbook with a sweepstakes prize layer, not as a regulated real-money sportsbook.
Who operates Fliff?
Current terms and rules identify Fliff Inc. as the operator and sweepstakes sponsor, with a King of Prussia, Pennsylvania address.
What happened with Fliff in California?
Fliff launched Superstars peer-to-peer DFS in May 2026 as a way to stay active in California after pressure on the older model.
What is the difference between Fliff Coins and Fliff Cash?
Fliff Coins are the social-play currency, while Fliff Cash is the free sweepstakes currency that can become redeemable after playthrough and verification.
Does Fliff have responsible-gaming tools?
Yes. The current responsible-gaming page describes session reminders, limit-setting, and self-exclusion request paths.
Should you treat Fliff like DraftKings or FanDuel?
No. Even though the front end feels sportsbook-like, the legal structure, prize rules, and state map are different.

As with the rest of this review, I would treat the operator's latest public terms, support pages, and rules as the deciding source for Fliff Social. If those pages change, the practical answer can change with them, especially on geography, redemption rules, and promotional balances. That is why I prefer a slightly conditional answer to a fake precise one. In this category, policy drift matters more than slogan drift. If you are comparing Fliff Social with other operators, use this answer as one data point rather than a standalone verdict. Geography, bonus treatment, and redemption rules tend to interact, so the useful question is usually not whether one isolated claim is true, but how that claim changes the total player experience once everything else is layered on top of it. That extra context matters because a lot of low-quality reviews flatten these issues into one-line verdicts. I am explicitly not doing that here. The better way to read the answer is: this is the current documented position, this is how it affects a real player, and this is why it either strengthens or weakens the case for using the site. If you only remember one thing from the FAQ, let it be this: the most reliable answer is the one that still matches the operator's current rules on the day you use the site. Everything in this section should be read with that recency check in mind. Most of the avoidable mistakes in this category come from treating stale review language as more current than the operator's own paperwork. This FAQ is meant to push you back toward the live documents before any meaningful decision. Use it as a shortcut, not a substitute. That is the most cautious way to keep the answer useful over time.

Sources and change history

Every dated record behind this review, and what changed when.

Secondary and regulator records · Accessed up to 21 Apr 2026

Access dates are when CasinoRankr read each source. Reading a source is not verifying it.

Change history

  • 5 May 2026 — FAQ section refreshed

These dates record wording changes, not fact-checking or product tests.

This section is the record. “On this page” scrolls here; a control marked ⧉ opens the same records in a panel over the page.

FINAL DECISION

We can't offer a Fliff Social link for Ohio right now

Operator access — Access is recorded per state. Rubric scores, reader sentiment and this profile do not depend on it.

CasinoRankr’s link decision — We can't offer a Fliff Social link for Ohio right now. That is a limit on this page's affiliate link, not a statement about Fliff Social's availability. The review below is unchanged.

Compare sweepstakes casinos instead →

Responsible play

Need help with gambling? Call or text 1-800-MY-RESET. Help is free, confidential, and available 24/7.

Play is optional, not an income plan.

HOW WE KNOW THIS

Access is recorded per state

Fliff Social

No research state

No state was detected or chosen, so no access record is shown.


Record used

CasinoRankr access records

Choose a research state to read its dated record.

A missing state is not a finding about the operator.

Open the availability section

HOW WE KNOW THIS

What the operator says it offers

Fliff Social · support status Operator-stated

No catalogue count recorded

Studios named on the profile include Proprietary.


Support status

Operator-stated

Operator-recorded figures, kept behind this disclosure.

These are the operator’s own claims, recorded. Nothing here is a CasinoRankr test of the catalogue.

Back to the games section

HOW WE KNOW THIS

How the calculated rubric score is produced

Every scored operator

Five weighted components · published range 3.0–5.0

Games & Variety 18%, Bonuses & Promos 18%, Trust & Safety 24%, Payouts & Speed 22%, UX & Mobile 18%. Component inputs are percentile-ranked within the scored set and mapped onto a 3.0–5.0 band, so a score sits inside a two-point range, not a five-point one.

Open methodology concern

A missing component input falls back to the median

Where a percentile row exists but an individual input is absent, the calculation substitutes the median. A median substitute is not a measurement, and CasinoRankr does not publish which inputs were measured for a given operator. Nothing here claims a substitution applied to this operator.


Source

CasinoRankr rubric method

The method is published on How we rate.

Operators with equal scores are ordered A–Z. Alphabetical order carries no editorial meaning.

Open the rating method

HOW WE KNOW THIS

What reader votes can and cannot show

All reader votes

Approval share of recorded up and down votes

The percentage is the share of up votes in the recorded total, rounded, with the sample size beside it.


Source

CasinoRankr reader votes

Counted as recorded on 24 Sep 2026.

Votes are self-selected opinion. They verify no player outcome and never move the rubric score.

Open vote integrity

READING THE EVIDENCE

How to read the evidence

Applies to every value shown on this page

“Not confirmed” and “Operator-stated”

Not confirmed means CasinoRankr holds no current record for that field. It is not a finding that the value is wrong, and not a finding about the operator. Operator-stated means the operator published the value and CasinoRankr has not verified it. Neither word is a verification, and neither is the presence of a link.

When a value shows no Inspect this record link

A missing link is not evidence of absence.

It does not establish whether a supporting record exists or whether research or verification has occurred.


Source

CasinoRankr evidence method

Reading a source is not verifying it, and an access date is not a verification date.

Source classes and dates are explained on How we rate.

How to read the evidence

EVERY DATED RECORD BEHIND THIS REVIEW

Sources and change history

Fliff Social · 9 records · 9 carry an access date

Secondary and regulator records · Accessed up to 21 Apr 2026

Access dates are when CasinoRankr read each source. Reading a source is not verifying it.

Change history

  • 5 May 2026 — FAQ section refreshed

These dates record wording changes, not fact-checking or product tests.


What this list does not do

A source list is a provenance record.

It shows where a claim came from. Reading a source is not verifying it, and a capture date is not a verification date.

Open the full record on the profile